Thanks to Debra Schneider for suggesting additional texts for 11th-grade! Here’s Debra’s list in case you missed it:
Excerpts of the Geneva Conventions?
Vietnam’s Declaration of Independence?
Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech?
JFK’s address to the nation re civil rights in 1963?
John Lewis’s speech Aug ’63 March on Washington?
FDR’s Second Inaugural Address?
Excerpts from Declaration of Sentiments from Seneca Falls?
Beth and I agree that these texts should be added to the list. We already have excerpts from the Vietnamese Declaration of Independence, Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech, the Truman Doctrine, and JFK’s speech on civil rights of 1963 in the History Blueprint Cold War unit. We have designed literacy supports for some of these in the unit. The only document we are unsure about is the Geneva Convention. Would this be the part about universal human rights?
I also suggest pairing some of these texts with another source from the same time period which expresses the opposite point of view. There’s a problem with giving too many inspiring and wise texts to teenagers. They take the ideas for granted and often don’t see that the true significance of the text is that it originally stated a position that contradicted the existing status-quo and the belief systems of most people. If the teacher begins by giving them a text that expresses beliefs and practices that are condemned today, and then gives them the inspiring and transformational text, students will gain insight into the significance of the text as well as understanding the perspective that the text was opposing.
A good example of this strategy comes from a lesson that Jed Larsen, of Kit Carson Middle School in Sacramento, designed for his 8th-grade US History class. The anchor text he wanted his class to read closely was not the Seneca Falls “Declaration of Sentiments,” but another text on the subject of woman suffrage, Susan B. Anthony’s speech “On Woman’s Right to Vote,” from 1873:
‘Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
“We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people – women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government – the ballot. . . .
To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household – which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.’
Jed Larsen chose this text for several reasons: the woman suffrage movement is one of the standards in the 8th-grade US History standards; Anthony makes a forceful case for woman suffrage based on comparison to the constitution; and the text is logically structured and well-written. He says that it is a text his class turns to again and again as they study related issues later in the course.
But to grab his students’ attention and to emphasize the impact of Anthony’s text, he first has students read an excerpt from an article, “How American Women Should Vote,” by Sarah Josepha Hale, the editor of Godey’s Lady’s Book. Hale wrote:
‘“I control seven votes; why should I desire to cast one myself?” said a lady who, if women went to the polls, would be acknowledged as a leader. This lady is a devoted, beloved wife, a faithful, tender mother; she has six sons. She knows her influence is paramount over the minds she has carefully trained. She feels her interests are safe confided to those her affection has made happy. She trusts her country will be nobly served by those whom her example has taught to believe in goodness, therefore she is proud to vote by her proxies. This is the way American women should vote, namely, by influencing rightly the votes of men.’
This short excerpt gives students evidence about the 19th-century cult of true womanhood and Victorian domesticity, as well as expressing counterarguments to Anthony’s text. Larsen reports that his students are shocked that a woman would have argued against woman suffrage. It is that shock that prepares them to read the inspiring and wise text with some understanding of its historical context.
If you have suggestions to add to the “Texts Worthy of Close Reading by Grade Level,” please add them in a comment.
Jed Larsen teaches 7th- and 8th-grade history at Kit Carson Middle School in Sacramento. He is a teacher leader for the History Project at UC Davis.
Susan B. Anthony, “Women’s Right to Vote, 1873,” Internet Modern History Sourcebook, edited by Paul Halsall, 1997, http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/1873anthony.asp.
Sarah Josepha Hale, “How American Women Should Vote,” Editor’s Table, Godey’s Lady’s Book, April 1852; Mothers in Uncle Tom’s America website, edited by Maureen E. Riedy, University of Virginia, August, 1997, http://xroads.virginia.edu/~ma97/riedy/womvote.html.
Francis Benjamin Johnston, Susan B. (Susan Brownell) Anthony, between ca. 1890 and ca. 1910, The Library of Congress, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2001704086/.
Godey’s Fashions for December 1861, Godey’s Lady’s Book, Library of Congress, http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/97511046/.
Filed under: General |